香港新浪網 MySinaBlog
« 上一篇 | 下一篇 »
陳牛 | 26-Feb-08 | 純屬瞎掰 | (1078 Reads)

我以前只知道東漢有個讓梨的孔融,而不知道周融。我也不知道周融犯過甚麼錯竟得罪了那麼多的人。

本人也認為政府突然降低招聘條件的做法很不妥,這問題在於政府的無常,在於政府改變做法可能只為給某個人機會。從陰謀論的角度來看,政府一直想港台死,會否藉一個無能的領導來搞垮港台,殺港台於無形?無常的政府是很恐怖的,當年毛澤東提出百花齊放,但等花都開了毛澤東馬上變臉算他們帳;鄧竟成說藏有「淫照」也可能有罪,沒幾天他的副手又有另一套說法。所以突然降低招聘條件事小,政府臉孔無常卻可以很恐怖。政府這次降低招聘條件真的是相信無大學學歷者的能力嗎?未必,下次政府可能為了某個人而把條件提高到博士學歷,把別的更有能力的擋在門外讓某人輕鬆得以上任。

但是,問題並不在於沒有大學學歷的人沒有資格出任廣播處長。

張文光可以用事實說明周融沒有能力出任廣播處長。但他說,沒有大學學歷就沒有資格,如果讓無大學學歷者出任那就是對港台的侮辱,這不是對無學歷者的歧視還能是甚麼?周融出來反擊,張文光始終不承認是學歷歧視,卻又仍然強調降低門檻的做法是矮化港台。如果我說張文光這議員不是民選出來的,矮化了立法會矮化了香港的民主,算不算對他的歧視?如果讓葉劉淑儀這種學歷高的人來代替張文光的議員職位,算不算拔高了立法會?

這世上,幾乎沒有人會承認自己在歧視,而歧視又總是在發生。「我最討厭兩種人,一是種族歧視者,一是黑人。」張文光不正是這種人嗎?

張文光說,周融想做廣播處長,整條廣播道路人皆知。張文光這一句又何嘗不是在轉移視線?中國的傳統文化教育我們,不能有野心。「司馬昭之心,路人皆知」這是一句帶有批判意味的話。但是一個想做廣播處長的周融有甚麼錯?一個想當將軍的小兵有甚麼錯?張文光為甚麼不直接說他不喜歡周融這條仆街,為甚麼不直接說周融是廢柴沒能力領導港台?

小奧認為是周融「把其他沒大學學位的人拉下水」,我不認同。「把其他沒大學學位的人拉下水」的人是張文光,是張文光讓周融有機會「利用弱勢扶助一把」。張文光有種就應該把炮口直接對準周融,而不是說出一句沒有大學學歷的人出任廣播處長是對港台的侮辱。你他媽又要裝得對事不對人一樣。如果周融是公認的仆街廢柴,那對人即是對事,你又何懼背負對人不對事的罵名!

周融是不是好鳥我還看不出來,但張文光肯定是個操蛋。

[tags]周融,張文光,廣播處長,學歷[/tags]

Technorati : , , ,


[1] Rubbish Cheung MK

I do agree with your views. Cheung Man Kwong is a dirty rubbish. Shame on him!


[引用] | 作者 Tony | 27-Feb-08 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[2] Re: Tony
Tony :
I do agree with your views. Cheung Man Kwong is a dirty rubbish. Shame on him!

Cheung man kwong is our hero. Fully support what he said.


[引用] | 作者 spiderman | 27-Feb-08 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[3] 周融 是 沒有資格出任廣播處長

Hi Cow, Sorry I disagree your point of view.

Even I dislike Cheung Man Kwong,... etc., but in this case they are 100% right. Pls don't be fooled by this snaky Chow Yung who intended to divert public's attention to the matter of 'whether to have a degree' or even as ridiculous as to 'qualification discrimination.' These are not the centre of the matter here.

People like Cheung Man Kwong were criticizing the HK Govt's hidden agenda in lowering the qualification threshold so as to allow themselve to appoint someone they love. i.e. HK Govt's recruit openly is an acting, they are cheating the public.

So the critic had never been meant to be on Chow Yung or anyone who does not have a degree; the critic was on HK Govt's act to cheat the Public.

To declare my interest, I don't have a degree either ... as I was born in 60's when there were only two universities. It was very very very hard to get into one regretfully.

As to Chow Yung's point of view, I have to say it was so wrong to describe an requirement of a certain qualification as discrimination. To become a pilot, you are required to have perfect eye sight, then can we say airlines discriminate short-sighted people? To become a policeman, one has to be at least 160cm tall, then can we say Govt discriminates short guys (I was both short and short-sighted.) I guess no lor...
Chow Yung was just intending to trigger a confusion to disguise the dirty deal between HK Govt and him.

Finally, the lack of qualification is not like skin colour, gender, physical disability or illness which we were born with. In HK, we are all open to equal opportunity to get as much/high qualification as we want, we can. If we are really 'discriminated' because of this, we should stop resenting and go presue one.

Arod


[引用] | 作者 Arod | 29-Feb-08 | [舉報垃圾留言]

[4]

totally agree with arod,,,之前蔡子強在明報也提及此事..明顯地指出學歷要求不是歧視..

一個可能成為署長的人.竟然理直氣狀地為社會帶來歪理.分化社會的有學位與無學位人士..這一切只為爭取更多支持..


[引用] | 作者 正義?? | 02-Mar-08 | [舉報垃圾留言]